A pilot product of the Uber self-driving motor vehicle is exhibited at the Uber Superior Technologies Heart on September 13, 2016 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Afp / AFP / Getty Photographs

Uber denied Waymo’s allegations that it is utilizing technological innovation stolen from the Alphabet firm by an ex-worker just before he joined Uber, saying in a courtroom filing that it is “unambiguously building its very own technological innovation impartial of Waymo.”

The courtroom filing on Friday will come in reaction to Waymo’s request past month for a federal choose to halt Uber’s self-driving motor vehicle efforts. Waymo submitted a lawsuit in February against Uber, alleging that previous worker Anthony Levandowski downloaded 14,000 firm files just before leaving and setting up his very own self-driving truck firm, Otto. Uber obtained Otto past calendar year and put in Levandowski as the leader of its self-driving motor vehicle program.

The lawsuit facilities all-around laser technological innovation referred to as LiDAR (Mild Detection And Ranging), which aids self-driving cars see and navigate. Uber claims its very own technological innovation is “fundamentally different” from Waymo’s – Uber’s design and style employs four lenses, while Waymo’s employs a single lens – and referred to as the request to pause its self-driving program a “misfire.”

“A cursory inspection of Uber’s LiDAR and Waymo’s allegations slide like a dwelling of cards,” Uber claimed.

Uber claimed its very own forensic evaluation concluded that no Waymo documents crossed above into Uber’s techniques, and that halting its program “would impede Uber’s efforts to remain a practical business.” (Uber CEO Travis Kalanick has referred to as self-driving cars an existential risk to the journey-hail giant’s business.) The firm also claimed the truth that Waymo waited for five months right after understanding Levandowski downloaded files to search for an injunction against Uber shows a absence of urgency. And it presented testimony from Scott Boehmke, who began building the company’s very own LiDAR techniques in 2015.

Uber also presented testimony from one more worker who joined Otto right after leaving Waymo, Sameer Kshirsagar, who’s also named in Waymo’s suit. Waymo alleges he also downloaded files just before leaving the firm for Otto. The testimony claims that he downloaded unique documents cited in Waymo’s allegations while producing a transition memo for his staff just before departing, but did not consider them with him. In the circumstance of one more doc, a checklist, Kshirsagar claimed he may possibly have forwarded them to a personalized unit for overview while doing the job at Waymo, but has not accessed them due to the fact he remaining the firm.

“I did not consider any private Google/Waymo documents with me on my departure from Google/Waymo for use at Uber and/or Otto. I have not made use of any private Google/Waymo documents or facts in my work for Uber and/or Otto,” Kshirsagar’s assertion claims. “I was under no circumstances directed by any person, at Uber or Otto, or if not, to consider private documents or facts from Google or Waymo.”

The journey-hail big also submitted 3 additional documents with its reaction. Two ended up from LiDAR gurus: a person from Paul McManamon, a scientist at the University of Dayton, and the other from a laser and optoelectronic design and style consultant named Michael Lebby. The two declarations assistance Uber’s assert that some parts of the design and style of Waymo’s LiDAR technological innovation are not trade tricks and are publicly known within the field. The 3rd declaration was from the head of a New York-centered electronic forensics lab.

Uber may possibly have searched its very own servers, but Levandowski, the leader of its self-driving motor vehicle program, has asserted a Fifth Modification proper to stay away from self-incrimination. That means he isn’t cooperating in the lookup.

On Wednesday, Judge William Alsup warned that “I’ve under no circumstances seen a history this sturdy in forty two years,” referring to Waymo’s body of proof against Uber, according to Reuters.

In reaction to Uber’s courtroom reply on Friday, a Waymo spokesperson claimed the firm centered its request for the choose to halt Uber’s self-driving motor vehicle program “based on obvious proof.”

“Uber’s assertion that they’ve under no circumstances touched the 14,000 stolen files is disingenuous at ideal, presented their refusal to seem in the most evident place: the pcs and products owned by the head of their self-driving program,” Waymo claimed.